Democrat Party presidential nominee Kamala Harris speaks on the campaign trail. Facebook/KamalaHarris
Democrat Party presidential nominee Kamala Harris has a blood lust for dead babies.
She is the most radical pro-abortion candidate to ever seek the White House.
She favors no restrictions on abortion. She also is anti-Catholic at a minimum, and likely anti-Christian, for anyone applying their faith to abortion.
Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Boyce College, made the case on Harris in his column Monday in WORLD magazine:
Need proof? Look at the excitement of the pro-abortion crowd. Look at her promise to end the Hyde Amendment and fund abortion with revenue taken from the federal taxpayer. Look at the proposals to use the entire federal government to advance the abortion cause. Look at her opposition to crisis pregnancy centers and states’ rights. Look at who she chose as her running mate. Finally, look at one central and undeniable fact: Vice President Kamala Harris has not directly identified a single limitation or restriction she would accept—all the way up until birth. Not one. Not a single one.
Mohler criticizing Harris followed former NFL coach Tony Dungy calling out Harris for comments connecting faith and abortion.
Harris posted the following on X Sept. 19: “One does not have to abandon their faith or deeply held beliefs to agree: The government, and certainly Donald Trump, should not be telling a woman what to do with her body.”
Former NFL coach Tony Dungy challenged Democrat Party presidential nominee Kamala Harris after she recently connected faith and abortion. USA TODAY Sports/KirbyLee via USA TODAY
Dungy, the first NFL black coach to win a Super Bowl, responded to Harris with the following:
Dear VP Harris: I hear you make this statement all the time. Exactly what ‘faith’ are you talking about when you say you don’t have to abandon it to support abortion? Are you talking about the Christian faith that says all babies are made in the image of God (Gen 1:26), that God places them in the womb (Jer 1:5) and that we should not take any life unjustly (Luke 18:20)? Are you talking about that faith or some nebulous, general ‘faith’ that says we’re good enough, and smart enough to make our own decisions? What “faith” are you talking about?
This column reported a month ago after Evangelicals for Harris emerged that as U.S. senator Harris created a religious litmus test for federal court nominees. Craycraft wrote the following for First Things:
As a U.S. senator, Harris was anti-Catholic and created a religious litmus test for Brian Buescher, a federal District Court nominee. Harris put the following written question to him:
Since 1993, you have been a member of the Knights of Columbus, an all-male society comprised primarily of Catholic men. In 2016, Carl Anderson, leader of the Knights of Columbus, described abortion as ‘a legal regime that has resulted in more than 40 million deaths.’ Mr. Anderson went on to say that ‘abortion is the killing of the innocent on a massive scale.’ Were you aware that the Knights of Columbus opposed a woman’s right to choose when you joined the organization?
A religious litmus test is anti-American.
California Attorney General Harris prosecuted the Center for Medical Progress after exposing Planned Parenthood for selling harvested organs from aborted babies for profit. Planned Parenthood also was a major campaign donor to Harris.
Kenneth Craycraft compiled damaging evidence in October 2020 of actions Harris has taken against people of faith:
Similarly, in 2015, Harris was an enthusiastic advocate of California’s so-called Reproductive FACT Act, which forced pro-life pregnancy centers to inform their clients where they could obtain free abortions and to advertise abortion clinics. Claiming to have “co-sponsored” the FACT Act, Harris praised then California governor Jerry Brown for signing it into law. . . . And in 2015, she used her power as California attorney general to put six Catholic hospitals out of business on behalf of another of her political patrons, the Service Employees International Union.
As a U.S. senator, Harris introduced the Orwellian “Do No Harm Act,” the purpose of which is to force religious individuals and organizations to engage in activities that directly violate their firmly held religious beliefs. . . .
Nothing says “respecting people’s faith” like compelling people of faith to violate their conscience.
Vice President Harris doesn’t want the government telling women what to do with their bodies–unless it’s the covid vaccine. She oozes hypocrisy.
There is overwhelming and compelling evidence that Harris dislikes people of faith acting on abortion with their conscience. For all of her flip-flopping Harris will never flip-flop on abortion.
The issue of a follower of Jesus Christ voting for Democrats under the current abortion climate has generated much debate among believers. Kamala Harris would get rid of the Senate filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade into federal law, adding to her abortion extremism.
Many followers of Jesus Christ argue no Christian can support the current Democratic party, based on all things in the culture war, not just abortion. A Christ follower voting for a candidate or party that celebrates abortion is not an issue of salvation. There is a strong contention, however, a Christ follower voting for a party and candidate who celebrates abortion fails to glorify God with the willful act of voting.
1 Corinthians 10:31 states: “Whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.” Colossians 3:17 states: “Whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks through Him to God the Father.”
Does it glorify God to vote for a candidate or party that celebrates abortion?
Does it glorify God for a Christ follower to support a candidate and party that favors abortion to the moment of birth, or after being born?
Can a Christ follower praise God after voting for a candidate or party that celebrates abortion?
The answer to those questions is “No!”
Dungy and Mohler were right to criticize Harris.